English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Arnaldo’s reply to Clodio ( Persiles , I, 16) composes a deliberate game with the notions of ‘praise’ and ‘vituperation’ and their relations with certain axiological concepts. On the other hand, the general content of this text is particularly ironic towards Clodio’s ethos and his moral conduct later in the plot. The singular features of the passage could have been inspired by Latin proverbs, for instance the paremiological antologies of Polidoro Virgilio (1498) and Erasmus (1500), who implanted a flourishing genre of exegesis during the Renaissance. Thus, the present article, after an outline of such influence on the Persiles and its Cervantist development, explains the originality of 1, 16, according to the possible influence of 3 “Polidorian” sacral adages (numbers 474, 477 and 478), in order to establish a taxonomy among the hypotexts, since each one of them has elaborated the passage to a particular degree.

<em>Alabanza y vituperio</em> en el <em>Persiles</em>, I, 16: Polidoro Virgilio como posible fuente paremiológica