English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Many studies examined the link between welfare regimes and welfare state attitudes, but their results are mixed. The present study further examines this question by focusing on the post-communist regimes, characterized by strong statist legacy and various welfare developmental paths following the 1989/1991 ruptures. Using the EVS 2008 data, the author compares the attitudes on state responsibility in post-communist regimes to other welfare regimes, with particular attention to the cohort differences. The results indicate a greater probability of extreme statist views among generations socialized during periods of generous welfare practices. The regime differences matter as well, also indicating an importance of welfare regime practices for the state attitudes. This is, in particular, suggested by the clustering of the post-communist and the Mediterranean regimes, which stand out both with the legacy of statist practices and higher probability of extreme statist attitudes among all four cohorts.Mnoga su istraživanja proučavala odnos režima socijalne države i stavova o državi, no njihovi su rezultati raznoliki. Ovaj rad pristupa tom problemu fokusiravši se na postkomunističke režime koje obilježava naslijeđe snažnog etatizma i raznovrsnih putanja razvoja socijalne države nakon 1989/1991. Na temelju podataka iz EVS 2008 autorica uspoređuje stavove o odgovornosti države u postkomunističkim režimima naspram ostalih režima, pri čemu se posebice bavi kohortnim razlikama. Rezultati ukazuju na veću vjerojatnost ekstremnih etatističkih stavova među generacijama socijaliziranim u razdoblju velikodušnih socijalnih praksi. Razlike među režimima su također bitne te govore u prilog važnosti praksi režima socijalnih država za stavove o državi. Na to, u konačnici, ukazuju i sličnosti između postkomunističkih i mediteranskih režima koji se ističu i naslijeđem etatističkih praksi i većom vjerojatnošću ekstremnih etatističkih stavova među sve četiri kohorte

Cohort and Welfare Regime Differences in Attitudes on State: Multilevel Analysis of 29 Countries