English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

An intuitive and influential two-compartment model of cancer cell growth proposed by Gyllenberg and Webb in 1989 [18] with transition rates between proliferating and quiescent cells reproduces some important features of the well known Gompertzian growth model. However, other plausible mechanisms may also be capable of producing similar dynamics. In this paper, we formulate a resource limited three-compartment model of avascular spherical solid tumor growth and study its dynamics. The resource, such as oxygen, is assumed to enter the tumor proportional to its surface area and the dead cells form the necrotic core inside the tumor. We show the tumor growth of our model mimics that of Gompertzian model, and the solutions of our model are naturally bounded. We also identify general and explicit expressions of the tumor final sizes and study the stability of the tumor at steady states. In contrast to the Gyllenberg-Webb model, our model confirms that tumor size at the positive steady state is strictly decreasing function of the dead cell removal rate. We also present two intriguing mathematical open questions.

Nutrient limitations as an explanation of Gompertzian tumor growth