English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

PurposeTo investigate whether “normal” eyes viewing through keratoconic (KC) eye aberrations can achieve a similar visual performance (VP) to that of KC eyes.MethodWe measured the high-contrast visual acuity (VA) and the 10, 15 and 20 c/deg contrast sensitivity (CS) of 6 KC eyes and 6 “normal” eyes while dynamically correcting their monochromatic aberrations. The VP of both populations was also measured when viewing through the usual sphero-cylindrical correction (i.e. spectacle correction) of each KC eye. In both cases, the desired wavefront was simulated thanks to a deformable mirror.ResultsDuring dynamic correction, both KC and “normal” eyes showed similar (P>0.10) amounts of higher-order aberrations (in average, 0.10μm of RMS for a 5.5mm pupil). The difference between KC and “normal” eyes’ VP was 0.24 log units and 0.12 log-MAR in terms of CS and VA, respectively. When viewing through KC eye aberrations, “normal” eyes showed comparable or slightly better CS (difference of 0.05 log units) but lower VA (difference of 0.13 logMAR) than KC eyes.ConclusionsKC subjects are adapted to their poor retinal image quality. However, this neural adaptation might only occur for usual “real life” visual tasks (i.e., VA-related tasks)

Visual Tasks Dependence of the Neural Compensation for the Keratoconic Eye's Optical Aberrations