English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

What considerations explain the voting behavior of supporters of political parties such as the Movement for Rights and Liberties (MRF), which seeks to represent the Turks and Muslims of Bulgaria, or the Democratic Union of Hungarians in Romania (UDMR) ? In contrast to an approach that treats declared ethnicity as an independent variable with measurable electoral effects, the authors examine, on the one hand, the historically situated and territorialized institutional and political contexts in which identity repertories (religion, language, culture, etc.) were constructed as politically relevant by candidates and/or their voters and, on the other hand, the meanings attached by the latter to their choices. Comparison suggests that support for “minority” candidates does not necessarily entail full support for a party’s identity-based platform and even less a homogenous definition of belonging. It also underscores the importance of understanding the relationship of the act of voting to the construction of the multi-scalar identifications (local, regional, national, European...) that variously engage kin states by redeploying relations between territories, citizenship and voting.

Les voix de l'appartenance : interpréter les votes « ethniques » en Bulgarie et en Roumanie