English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is still one of the best options for incontinence treatment. It may also have an  advantage for revision or reimplantation in the management of complications. In this study we aimed to discuss the etiological factors  for AUS reimplantation and effects of these etiological factors on success rates, patient satisfaction rates, time to reimplantation surgery,  and complications

Do the etiological factors in artificial urinary sphincter reimplantation cases affect success and complications?