English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The genus    Centroptella    Braasch &amp; Soldán, 1980 is accepted here in a wide sense, i.e., including    Chopralla    Waltz &amp; McCafferty, 1987. This genus concept is similar to the concept of the genus    Bungona    Harker, 1957 proposed by  Salles et al. (2016) , but with the generic name    Centroptella    instead of    Bungona   . The type species of    Bungona   ,    B.   narilla    Harker, 1957, has an unknown systematic position; the neotype designation proposed by  Suter and Pearson (2001)  is invalid, being inconsistent with the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature; the species name    B.   narilla    and the generic name    Bungona    are  nomina dubia , so the name    Centroptella    is the senior name for the genus under consideration. The generic names    Chopralla    and    Crassolus    Salles, Gattolliat &amp; Sartori, 2016 both are junior synonyms of    Centroptella    ( syn. nov. ). The subgenera    Bungona   ,    Centroptella    and    Chopralla    proposed by  Salles et al. (2016)  are unnatural. The following new combinations are proposed:    Centroptella   bintang    (Marle, Salles &amp; Gattolliat, 2016)  comb. nov. ,    Centroptella   bifida    (Shi &amp; Tong, 2019)  comb. nov. ,    Centroptella   fusina    (Tong &amp; Dudgeon, 2003)  comb. nov. ,    Centroptella   fustipalpus    (Lugo-Ortiz &amp; McCafferty, 1998)  comb. nov. ,    Centroptella   illiesi    (Lugo-Ortiz &amp; McCafferty, 1998)  comb. nov. ,    Centroptella   inzingae    (Crass, 1947)  comb. nov. ,    Centroptella   papilionodes    (Marle, Salles &amp; Gattolliat, 2016)  comb. nov. ,    Centroptella   pontica    (Sroka, Godunko &amp; Gattolliat, in  Sroka et al. 2019 )  comb. nov. ,    Centroptella   ovata    (Shi &amp; Tong, 2019)  comb. nov. ,    Centroptella   quadrata    (Shi &amp; Tong, 2019)  comb. nov.  and    Centroptella   saxophila    (Agnew, 1961)  comb. nov.  The two Australian species,    C.   fustipalpus    and    C.   illiesi   , differ from each other in the shape of tergalii; corrections to the original description of    C.   fustipalpus    are given based on re-examination of the holotype and paratypes; details of larval structures of    C.   illiesi    are figured. Corrections to the former descriptions of the South African species    C.   inzingae    and    C.   saxophila    are given. Examination of type material led to the discovery that the original description of the Oriental species    Centroptella   liebenauae    Soldán, Braasch &amp; Muu, 1987 was based on two different species: the descriptions of imago and subimago belong to    Centroptella   longisetosa    Braasch &amp; Soldán, 1980 (the type species of    Centroptella   ), and the description of larva belongs to a different species, which we describe here as    Centroptella   ingridae    sp. nov.  The holotype of    C.   liebenauae   , a larva, should be considered lost; based on the date of collection, it belonged to    C.   longisetosa   ; a set of larval exuviae with the same collecting data as the holotype, is designated as the neotype of    C.   liebenauae   , and a new synonymy is established:    C.   longisetosa    =    C.   liebenauae    syn. nov.  The larvae originally assigned to    C.   liebenauae    are placed to a new species    Centroptella   ingridae    sp. nov.  belonging to theinzingae   -ingridae    species group; all stages of development of this species are described based on male and female imagines reared from larvae in Thailand and on the misidentified paratypes of    C.   liebenauae    from Vietnam.    Centroptella   longisetosa    is redescribed based on the single paratype from China, the neotype and paratypes of    C.   liebenauae    from Vietnam, and additional material from India. Additional data on the holotype of    Centroptella   colorata    Soldán, Braasch &amp; Muu, 1987 are given.

Nomenclatural changes in Centroptella Braasch & Soldán, 1980 ( Ephemeroptera , Baetidae )