English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

According to the International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature, a younger name of a syntaxon may be conserved against its older name to improve the stability of the nomenclature and avoid misunderstandings in scientific communication. Here, we propose conserving the name  Philonotidion seriatae  Hinterlang 1992  for arctic-alpine, bryophyte-dominated, non-calcareous spring vegetation against the names  Cardamino-Montion  Braun-Blanquet 1925 ,  Cardamino-Montion  Braun-Blanquet 1926 , and  Montion  Maas 1959 . In current vegetation classification systems, the two name-giving taxa of  Cardamino-Montion  no longer indicate the character of the vegetation corresponding to the nomenclatural type of this alliance and are instead characteristic of other currently distinguished alliances. Maintaining the oldest name  Cardamino-Montion  in strict adherence to the Code would be a source of errors. In the current vegetation classification systems, two similar but counter-intuitive names would then have to be used:  Cardamino-Montion  for arctic-alpine springs (although the name-giving taxa are more indicative of montane springs) and  Epilobio nutantis-Montion  for montane springs (although the name-giving taxon  Epilobium nutans  is indicative of arctic-alpine vegetation). Hence, there is a risk that the name  Cardamino-Montion  may gradually become ambiguous. We also propose conserving the name  Philonotidion seriatae  against  Mniobryo-Epilobion hornemannii  Nordhagen 1943  to prevent confusion in case of a merger of these alliances.(36)  Philonotidion seriatae  Hinterlang 1992Typus:  Cratoneuro-Philonotidetum  Geissler 1976  (holotypus)(=)  Cardamino-Montion  Braun-Blanquet 1925Typus:  Bryetum schleicheri  Braun-Blanquet 1925  [≡  Montio fontanae-Bryetum schleicheri  Braun-Blanquet 1925  nom. corr. et invers. (alternative name)] (holotypus)(=)  Cardamino-Montion  Braun-Blanquet 1926  nom. superfl. [≡  Cardamino-Montion  Braun-Blanquet 1925 ](=)  Mniobryo-Epilobion hornemannii  Nordhagen 1943Typus:  Mniobryo-Epilobietum hornemannii  Nordhagen 1943  (lectotypus selected by Zechmeister &amp; Mucina 1994)(=)  Montion  Maas 1959  nom. superfl. [≡  Cardamino-Montion  Braun-Blanquet 1925 ]Taxonomic reference : Euro+Med PlantBase ( http://europlusmed.org ; accessed 4 January 2024)

vegetation classification and survey

﻿Proposal (36) to conserve the name  Philonotidion seriatae  Hinterlang 1992  for the species-poor, bryophyte-dominated, non-calcareous arctic-alpine spring vegetation of Europe

﻿Proposal (36) to conserve the name Philonotidion seriatae Hinterlang 1992 for the species-poor, bryophyte-dominated, non-calcareous arctic-alpine spring vegetation of Europe

Proposal (36) to conserve the name Philonotidion seriatae Hinterlang 1992 for the species-poor, bryophyte-dominated, non-calcareous arctic-alpine spring vegetation of Europe