English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Land use and cover change ( LUCC ) is the main cause of natural ecosystem degradation and biodiversity loss and can cause a decrease in ecosystem service provision. Animal populations are providers of some key regulation services: pollination, pest and disease control and seed dispersal, the so-called faunal ecosystem services ( FES ). Here we aim to give an overview on the current and future status of regulation  FES  in response to change from original habitat to agricultural land globally.  FES  are much more tightly linked to wildlife populations and biodiversity than are most ecosystem services, whose determinants are largely climatic and related to vegetation structure. Degradation of ecosystems by land use change thus has much more potential to affect  FES . In this scoping review, we summarise the main findings showing the importance of animal populations as  FES  providers and as a source of ecosystem disservices; underlying causes of agriculturalisation impacts on  FES  and the potential condition of  FES  under future  LUCC  in relation to the expected demand for  FES  globally. Overall, studies support a positive relationship between  FES  provision and animal species richness and abundance. Agriculturalisation has negative effects on  FES  providers due to landscape homogenisation, habitat fragmentation and loss, microclimatic changes and development of population imbalance, causing species and population losses of key fauna, reducing services whilst enhancing disservices. Since evidence suggests an increase in  FES  demand worldwide is required to support increased farming, it is imperative to improve the understanding of agriculturalisation on  FES  supply and distribution. Spatial conservation prioritisation must factor in faunal ecosystem functions as the most biodiversity-relevant of all ecosystem services and that which most closely links sites of service provision of conservation value with nearby sites of service use to provide ecosystem services of agricultural and economic value.

nature conservation

A review of regulation ecosystem services and disservices from faunal populations and potential impacts of agriculturalisation on their provision, globally