English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

ABCD (  Access to Biological Collection Data  ,  Holetschek et al. 2012 ) 2.06 was ratified by Biodiversity Information Standards ( TDWG ) in September 2005. In 2017, TDWG ratified the Standards Documentation Standard (SDS,  Vocabulary Maintenance Specification Task Group 2017 ), which is a set of regulations and guidelines on how TDWG standards should be structured and documented. Since then, ABCD has been classified with “2005 standards” on the  TDWG standards website . However, with the planned ratifications of the ABCD Extension for Geoscience (  ABCD EFG  ,  Petersen et al. 2018 ) and the more semantic ABCD 3.0 ( Fichtmueller et al. 2019 ), it became necessary to also ratify ABCD 2.06 under the SDS rules.In this talk, we will report on the progress of the ratification processes, both for ABCD 2.06 and ABCD EFG. In particular we want to address the specific challenges that arose from fitting existing XML schemas into the SDS structure and documenting them accordingly.

State of the (Re-)Ratification of ABCD 2.06 and ABCD EFG under the SDS Guidelines