English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

As rapid advances in sequencing technology  result in more branches of the tree of life being illuminated, there has actually been a decrease in the percentage of sequence records that are backed by voucher specimens  Trizna 2018b  .  The good news is that there are tools  Trizna (2017) ,  NCBI (2005) ,  Biocode LLC (2014)  to enable well-databased museum vouchers to automatically validate and format specimen and collection metadata for high quality sequence records. Another problem is that there are millions of existing sequence records that are known to contain either incorrect or incomplete specimen data. I will show an end-to-end example of sequencing specimens from a museum, depositing their sequence records in NCBI's (National Center for Biotechnology Information) GenBank database, and then providing updates to GenBank as the museum database revises identifications. I will also talk about linking records from specimen databases as well. Over one million records in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF)  Trizna (2018a)  contain a value in the Darwin Core term " associatedSequences ", and I will examine what is currently contained in these entries, and how best to format them to ensure that a tight connection is made to sequence records.

Best practices for connecting genetic records with specimen data