English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper, a comparison between feature extraction methods (Radon Cosine Method, Canny Contour Method, Fourier Transform, SIFT descriptor, and Hough Lines Method) and Convolutional Neural Networks (proposed CNN and pre-trained AlexNet) is presented. For the evaluation of these methods, depth maps were used. The tested data were obtained by Microsoft Kinect camera (IR depth sensor). The feature vectors were classified by the Support Vector Machine (SVM). The confusion matrix for the evaluation of experimental results was used. The row of confusion matrix represents target class of tested data and the column represents predicted class. From the experimental results, it is evident that the best results were achieved by proposed CNN (97.4%). On the other hand, the pre-trained AlexNet scored 93.7%.

Comparison of Neural Networks with Feature Extraction Methods for Depth Map Classification