English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Given observations of the standard candles and the cosmic chronometers, weapply Pad\'{e} parameterization to the comoving distance and the Hubbleparamter to find how stringent the constraint is set to the curvature parameterby the data. A weak informative prior is introduced in the modeling process tokeep the inference away from the singularities. Bayesian evidence for differentorder of Pad\'{e} parameterizations is evaluated during the inference to selectthe most suitable parameterization in light of the data. The data we usedprefer a parameterization form of comoving distance as $D_{01}(z)=\frac{a_0z}{1+b_1 z}$ as well as a competitive form $D_{02}(z)=\frac{a_0 z}{1+b_1 z +b_2 z^2}$. Similar constraints on the spatial curvature parameter areestablished by those models and given the Hubble constant as a byproduct:$\Omega_k = 0.25^{+0.14}_{-0.13}$ (68\% confidence level [C.L.]), $H_0 = 67.7\pm 2.0$ km/s/Mpc (68\% C.L.) for $D_{01}$, and $\Omega_k = -0.01 \pm 0.13$(68\% C.L.), $H_0 = 68.8 \pm 2.0$ km/s/Mpc (68\% C.L.) for $D_{02}$. Theevidence of different models demonstrates the qualitative analysis of thePad\'{e} parameterizations for the comoving distance.

Model-independent determination of cosmic curvature based on Pad\'{e} approximation