English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This erratum addresses an error in the text of Lo et al. (2013) and moreimportantly corrects a computational error that was made in all previouslypublished relativistic computations of absolute pulse waveform fluxes producedby hot spots on rotating stars that followed the radiation forward in time fromthe star to the observer. These computations used an incorrect expression forthe differential emitting area on the stellar surface, as measured in thecomoving frame. This erratum explains this error, lists all the publishedpapers that contain results affected by this error, and summarizes in a generalway why and how the results in Lo et al. (2013) were affected by this error, ina way that makes clear why and how the results in the other papers wereaffected. The idealized radiation spectra, beaming patterns, and spot shapesassumed in many of the previously reported computations of pulse waveforms verylikely introduced systematic errors that are much larger than the relativelysmall errors introduced by using an incorrect expression for the differentialemitting area. This erratum also corrects an error in the caption of Figure 5,an error in the text on page 19, and an incomplete description of our resultson page 24.

Erratum: "Determining neutron star masses and radii using energy-resolved waveforms of X-ray burst oscillations" (ApJ, 776, 19 [2013])