English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Changing the deedu0027s judicial qualification - as a form of changing accusation in the first instance - is a procedural institution, regulated by the Code of penal procedure of Romania. It may be ordered by the court of law, either ex officio or at the parties and prosecutorsu0027 demand. In accordance with Article 386 (1) Code of penal procedure, there are two possibilities regarding the changing deedu0027s judicial qualification, beyond providing it to the parties involved in the penal case. One of these implies the defendantu0027s right to require the judgment postponement, while the second refers to the defendantu0027s right to require a new term of judgment in order to prepare the defense along with the lawyer, either appoint by the court of law or designed by the defendant. In this procedural context, the court of law must respect the defendantu0027s rights during the penal trial, including the right to defense, as it is regulated by the Code of penal procedure and the Constitution of Romania as well. Some legal consequences are based on the procedure of solving penal cases, as pointed out in the current review literature.

Changing Accusation in the First Instance: One Step Forward in Criminal Procedure Law