English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study presents the results of an experimental study of two document clustering techniques which are k-means and k-means++. In particular, we compare the two main approaches in crime document clustering. The drawback of k-means is that the user needs to define the centroid point. This becomes more critical when dealing with document clustering because each center point represented by a word and the calculation of distance between words is not a trivial task. To overcome this problem, a k-means++ was introduced in order to find a good initial center point. Since k-means++ has not being applied before in crime document clustering, this study presented a comparative study between k-means and k-means++ to investigate whether the initialization process in k-means++ does help to get a better results than k-means. We proposes the k-means++ clustering algorithm, to identify best seed for initial cluster centers in clustering crime document. The aim of this study is to conduct a comparative study of two main clustering algorithms, namely k-means and k-means++. The method of this study includes a pre-processing phase, which in turn involves tokeniza-tion, stop-words removal and stemming. In addition, we evaluate the impact of the two similarity/distance measures (Cosine similarity and Jaccard coefficient) on the results of the two clustering algorithms. Exper-imental results on several settings of the crime data set showed that by identifying the best seed for initial cluster centers, k-mean++ can significantly (with the significance interval at 95%) work better than k-means. These results demonstrate the accuracy of k-mean++ clustering algorithm in clustering crime doc-uments.

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF K-MEANS AND K-MEANS++ CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS ON CRIME DOMAIN