English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The autobiographical letter from the Mexican nun and poet, Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz (1651-1695) to the Bishop of Puebla, Manuel Fernández de Santa Cruz, the Respuesta a Sor Filotea de la Cruz (1691; henceforth the Respuesta) remains one of the most studied, yet most misunderstood, texts in her extensive body of writings. In November 1690, Fernández de Santa Cruz published, without Sor Juana’s permission, a treatise entitled Carta atenagórica (1690), which the Jeronymite wrote in response to a sermon given by the Jesuit Antonio Vieira in 1655 on the question of ‘la mayor fineza de Cristo’, or the greatest demonstration of Christ’s love for mankind. As an introduction to the treatise he appended a pseudonymous letter written in the guise of a nun from Puebla, Sor Filotea de la Cruz, the Carta de Sor Filotea (1690; henceforth the Carta), in which he critiqued Sor Juana’s treatise and her commitment to intellectual pursuits. In response, Sor Juana penned the Respuesta, a defence against the accusations the Bishop had levelled against her

bulletin of hispanic studies

‘Las ciencias curiosas’: Curiosity, Studiousness and the New Philosophy in the <i>Carta de Sor Filotea de la Cruz</i> and the <i>Respuesta a Sor Filotea de la Cruz</i>

‘Las ciencias curiosas’: Curiosity, Studiousness and the New Philosophy in the Carta de Sor Filotea de la Cruz and the Respuesta a Sor Filotea de la Cruz