English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper I discuss the interpretation of dependent plural pronouns (pronouns bound by a distributing definite antecedent), and argue that they should be treated as "donkey" pronouns involving restricted functions. Such pronouns have been central to the study of reciprocals, and I follow in the tradition of studying the interaction of the two. Most analyses of the reciprocal allow it the option of finding its "range" argument through movement or binding to a non-local antecedent. I argue that such "long distance" reciprocals are insufficiently motivated, and cannot handle the full range of constructions involving dependent pronouns. I show that the proposed functional analysis of dependent pronouns makes it possible to account for "long distance" reciprocals without resorting to wide scope, by referring directly to the functional translation of their antecedent.

Reconciling Dependent Plurals with "Each Other"