English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper, we discuss the question whether phrasal comparatives should begiven a direct interpretation, or require an analysis as ellipticconstructions, and answer it with Yes and No. The most adequate analysis ofwide reading attributive (WRA) comparatives seems to be as cases of ellipsis,while a direct (but asymmetric) analysis fits the data for narrow scopeattributive comparatives. The question whether it is a syntactic or a semanticprocess which provides the missing linguistic material in the complement of WRAcomparatives is also given a complex answer: Linguistic context is accessed bycombining a reconstruction operation and a mechanism of anaphoric reference.The analysis makes only few and straightforward syntactic assumptions. In part,this is made possible because the use of Generalized Functional Application asa semantic operation allows us to model semantic composition in a flexible way.

Comparative Ellipsis and Variable Binding