English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In his classic work on the interpretation of the English existential construction, Gary Milsark (1974) proposed a two-way distinction in interpretations of determiner phrases, a two way classification of one-place predicates, and a generalization about their ability to combine. Milsark proposed that DPs can be given a ‘cardinality’ interpretation or a true ‘quantificational’ interpretation. The distinction between the two types of interpretation, or construal, trifurcates the syntactic category DP into those DPs which are unambiguously quantificational, unambiguously cardinal, or ambiguous between the two construals. The distinction between the two construals is illustrated by a subtle ambiguity in (1-2):

Thetic and Categorical, Stage and Individual, Weak and Strong