English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Dayal (2002) develops a theory of the readings of multiple wh-questions that is based on this judgment, crucially requiring movement of the lower wh-phrase to the question Complementizer in order to yield a pair-list reading. The single-pair reading is derived using a choice-function mechanism (Reinhart, 1998). The judgment in (1) has recently been contested by Cheng and Demirdache (C&D, 2010), citing Chris Tancredi (p.c.). C&D offer the context in (2) with the judgment that a pair-list answer (2a) is forced in this case and the single-pair answer is deviant (2b).

Intervention, covert movement, and focus computation in multiple wh-questions