English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

0. Introduction This paper provides evidence that the P-stranding pattern in Bahasa Indonesia (BI) poses a counterexample to the P-Stranding Generalization proposed by Merchant (2001) in favor of his analysis of sluicing as the product of whmovement followed by TP deletion at PF. I first provide two arguments, based on the distribution of the question marker -kah (Fortin 2007) and the lack of the complementizer yang with wh-questions with non-nominal fronted wh-words that sluicing in BI is derived by regular wh-movement, as in English wh-questions. I propose that the three-way contrast between English, French, and BI with respect to P-stranding under wh-questions and sluicing is naturally derived from independently motivated assumptions concerning the percolation of the [+wh] feature of the DP onto the PP (Chomsky 1972), D-to-P incorporation (Law 1998, van Riemsdijk 1998), and the recent idea of interface repair (Merchant 2001, Lasnik 1999, 2001, 2005, 2007, Fox and Lasnik 2003, Boeckx and Lasnik 2006).

Sluicing in Bahasa Indonesia, P-Stranding, and Interface Repair