English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The non-standard character of these sentences stems from the fact that the speaker seems to change syntactic direction halfway through the utterance. As a consequence, each of the sentences contains a constituent that is simultaneously part of two sentential structures. In (3), for instance, the NP my big area of interest in linguistics relates both to the preceding that’s to yield a complete sentence, as well as to the following is discourse, which renders another complete sentence. With traditional rhetoric, such structures can be categorized as apo koinou constructions. Instead of characterizing these utterances as the result of a speaker’s midsentence change of mind, however, I do not regard them as performance errors. Rather, I view them as instantiations of a syntactic construction in its own right,

The That’s X is Y Construction as an Information-Structure Amalgam