English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A mainstay of judicial reform implemented in the Republic of Panama is the principle of separation of functions, whereby functions of investigation and prosecution are clearly defined, so that the prosecution cannot make decisions of a judicial nature which involving violation of fundamental rights of citizens and the judge it is prohibited from being acts of investigation. This article aims to outline the main areas in which affects the principle of separation of functions under the adversarial system according to law 63 of 2008, analyzing some problematic situations in which the application of that principle provides a compatible solution respect for the fundamental rights of citizens in a democratic rule of law.

Breves reflexiones sobre el principio de separación de funciones en el sistema acusatorio panameño