English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Working memory is considered as a cognitive memory buffer for temporarily holding, processing, and manipulating information. Although working memory for verbal and visual information has been studied extensively in the past literature, few studies have systematically investigated how depth information is stored in working memory. Here, we show that the memory performance for detecting changes in stereoscopic depth is low when there is no change in relative depth order, and the performance is reliably better when depth order is changed. Increasing the magnitude of change only improves memory performance when depth order is kept constant. However, if depth order is changed, the performance remains high, even with a small change magnitude. Our findings suggest that relative depth order is a better indicator for working memory performance than absolute metric depth. The memory representation for individual depth is not independent, but inherently relational, revealing a fundamental organizing principle for depth information in the visual system.

Relation matters: relative depth order is stored in working memory for depth