English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In chronometric research, it is well-known that many response devices used with personal computers, especially computer keyboards, suffer from measurement inaccuracies due to infrequent polling. In this article, it is investigated whether it is worth being concerned by this added error, given that human performance inherently exhibits a considerable degree of variability. By comparing inaccuracy due to response device imprecision with the level of variability already present in human performance, it is shown that the former is very unlikely to have a negative impact on statistical outcomes. In other words, millisecond resolution of response devices, although desirable, is not a general requirement.

Does variability in human performance outweigh imprecision in response devices such as computer keyboards?