English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Sixty undergraduates were led to believe that either a highly competent clinician (high expert communicator) or a clinical psychologist of questionable ability (low expert communicator) had filled out an adjective check list describing a stimulus person in either favorable or unfavorable terms. According to prediction, Ss who had received information from the high expert source described themselves as more confident in the information and felt less desire for additional information to make “an important decision” regarding the stimulus person. Contrary to prediction, however, unfavorable information led to less confidence and greater desire for additional information than did favorable information.

Confidence in impression formation as a function of favorableness of information and expertness of source