English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The relative contributions of motor and visual feedback to illusion decrement for the Müller-Lyer (ML) and horizontal-vertical (HV) illusions were estimated after subjects judged the perceived equality of standard and comparison lines with or without visual feedback and after the subject or the experimenter adjusted the comparison line (motor feedback). Visual feedback in the absence of motor feedback reduced magnitude of illusion by 38% for the ML illusion and by 45% for the HV illusion. Motor feedback in the absence of visual feedback reduced magnitude of illusion by 17% for the ML illusion and by 27% for the HV illusion. Estimates of “strategic” factors, commonly interpreted as the correction of inaccurate routine problem-solving and judgmental factors, also contain components of motor learning.

Nonequivalent roles for motor and visual feedback in the Müller-Lyer and horizontal-vertical illusions