English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The present study was designed as an analogue to the acquisition and extinction of a classically conditioned phobic response. Thirty electrodermally labile and 30 electrodermally stabile non-phobic male undergraduates were assigned randomly to one of two experimental conditions, utilizing either “prepared” or “unprepared” CSs, after Seligman (1971). It was hypothesized that electrodermally labile subjects, in contrast to stabiles, would require a greater number of trials to habituate to either CS, would exhibit greater changes in log skin conductance during acquisition, would report higher verbal discomfort ratings related to the CS, and would require a greater number of trials to extinction. Differences between labiles and stabiles were also predicted for instrumental “escape” behavior during extinction. The results revealed significant differences between labile and stabile subjects on all predicted dimensions; however, no significant differences were found for the “prepared” versus “unprepared” CS contingencies. The study also reports unusual evidence for a relationship between a self-report measure of arousal and concomitant psychophysiological responsivity.

Individual differences in electrodermal response conditioning and self-report of discomfort: A phobia analogue