English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Nine tests requiring visual or auditory pattern comparison, visual-auditory intersensory integration, temporal-spatial integration, or both types of integration simultaneously were administered to 414 first-grade children. Error scores indicate that neither auditory-visual nor temporal-spatial integration is more difficult than similar comparisons not involving integration. Spatial patterns were much easier to compare by contrast to temporal patterns.

On the relative difficulty of auditory and visual temporal and spatial, integrative and nonintegrative sequential pattern comparisons