English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Two groups of 20 Ss were run in a classical eyelid conditioning experiment with one group receiving a UCS intensity of 50 mm and the other a 100 mm intensity. Acquisition data showed superior performance in the group receiving the weaker UCS, a direct reversal from that found in CRF eyelid conditioning. Analysis of CRs following reinforced and non-reinforced trials indicated that although both groups performed at a significantly higher level following reinforced trials, there was no interaction between the two kinds of CRs and UCS intensity.

An inverse effect of UCS intensity upon partially reinforced eyelid conditioning