English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

A description by Levison and Restle (1968) of deficiencies in the method of constant stimuli is shown to be logically in error. Their data, as well as those from other experiments, are interpretable in terms of a response bias that may distort data in a variety of psychophysical studies. This bias is the tendency of Ss to use available responseswith equal frequency.

The invalidity of “invalid results from the method of constant stimuli”: A common artifact in the methods of psychophysics