English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Physical constraints produce variations in the shapes of biological objects that correspond to their sizes. Bingham (in press-b) showed that two properties of tree form could be used to evaluate the height of trees. Observers judged simulated tree silhouettes of constant image size appearing on a ground texture gradient with a horizon. According to the horizon ratio hypothesis, the horizon can be used to judge object size because it intersects the image of an object at eye height. The present study was an investigation of whether the locus of the horizon might account for Bingham's previous results. Tree images were projected to a simulated eye height that was twice that used previously. Judgments were not halved, as predicted by the horizon ratio hypothesis. Next, the original results were replicated in viewing conditions that encouraged the use of the horizon ratio by including correct eye height, gaze level, and visual angles. The heights of cylinders were inaccurately judged when they appeared with horizon but without trees. Judgments were much more accurate when the cylinders also appeared in the context of trees.

Perceiving the size of trees: Biological form and the horizon ratio