English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Empirical forced-choice psychometric functions often depart in shape from those based on the theory of normal sensory-excitation distributions and optimal decision processes. The typical departure is that the detectability of small signals is too low compared to that of high signals. Some possible explanations were reviewed and it was emphasized that the source of the effect is not known with certainty. An extra parameter resembling a threshold was introduced for the measurement of the effect, and a method of moments was proposed for estimating the two parameters of the resulting two-alternative forced-choice psychometric function. The method was tried out with success in the task of detecting a 0.1-sec luminance increment to a steady adapting luminance of a large visual target. There were large amounts of low-signal suppression, indicating the advisability of reviewing some current psychophysical practices.

Measurement of low-signal suppression and other parameters of the forced-choice psychometric function