English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Peripheral visual stimuli were presented in conjunction with an autokinetic target to determine the influence of additional visual contour on the amount and direction of autokinetic movement. The addition of any peripheral stimulus resulted in a significant decrease in autokinesis. The greatest reduction occurred when peripheral stimuli were presented at near eccentricities and when the peripheral stimulus completely surrounded the autokinetic stimulus. Peripheral stimuli also influenced the direction of autokinesis. Stimuli placed at 1° eccentric to the autokinetic stimulus increased the amount of autokinetic motion in the direction away from the additional stimulus. Also, at more peripheral placements, a vertical bar increased autokinetic movement in the vertical plane. These results are interpreted within the context of the contribution of additional stimuli in the visual field to enhanced fixational stability.

The influence of peripheral stimuli on the amount and direction of autokinesis