English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Following extended training in a visual detection task, functions were determined for individual Ss relating latency of detection responses to number of redundant signal elements embedded in tachistoscopic displays of letters and to distance between signal elements. Latency proved invariant with respect to number of redundant signals and varied non-monotonically with distance. Of the several types of models considered in relation to previous studies, substantial support was forthcoming only for an independent stimulus sampling model. It is suggested that the detection method effects a relatively clear separation of the perceptual from the mnemonic aspects of the standard visual apprehension experiment, and that the sampling process may constitute only the first phase of a more general model which includes both parallel and serial information processing.

Further evidence concerning scanning and sampling assumptions of visual detection models