English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Subjects monitored for the syllable-initial phonemes /b/ and /s/, as well as for the syl- lables containing those phonemes, in lists of nonsense syllables. Time to detect /b/ was a function of the amount of uncertainty as to the identity of the vowel following the target consonant; when uncertainty was low, no difference existed between phoneme and syllable monitoring latencies, but when uncertainty was high, syllables were detected faster than phonemes. Time to detect /s/ was independent of uncertainty concerning the accompanying vowel and was always slower than syllable detection. The role of knowledge of contexts in a phoneme-monitoring task as well as the relative availability of phonemic information to the listener in this task are discussed. The processes involved in the recognition and the identification of phonemic components of the speech signal have been examined from a number of per- spectives in the past few years. One line of study, originally undertaken in an attempt to determine the "basic" psychological and acoustic units of speech perception, has used a monitoring task to examine the relative order of detectability of phonemes, syllables, and words in speech. Savin and Bever (1970) began this work by demonstrating that moni- toring (detection) time for syllables is faster than that for phonemes in a list of syllables, a finding they took to be evidence that syllables are basic perceptual units and that phonemes are not. A number of subse- quent studies, however, have forced considerable reinterpretation of these results (see, in particular, Foss & Swinney, 1973; Healy & Cutting, 1976;

Phonemic identification in a phoneme monitoring experiment: The variable role of uncertainty about vowel contexts