English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper criticizes the current approach in psychophysics in interpreting the absolute or difference limen indices under the reciprocity relation for small values of t and under the constancy relation for large values of t. It reiterates Tayal’s (1965) model, and demonstrates, by examining its empirical validity against reported data, that the phenomenon can be meaningfully interpreted under a single set of principles for the entire range of t values including the outcomes in the so-called critical duration. It demonstrates that the two apparently different mathematical relations do not signify any dichotomy at the level of receptor mechanism or functional processing; rather, they approximate a better articulated function which is capable of characterizing the phenomenon for the entire range of t values inclusive of the inexplicable critical duration “tc.”

Absolute and difference limen in visual perception as a function of the duration of stimulus pulse