English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Three experiments were carried out to investigate the effects upon subsequent recall of categorizing a stimulus at presentation by one of its attributes. The results indicated that a previously reported finding of categorized cue superiority for integral stimuli in an incidental learning paradigm may not be a robust one. Two experiments employed either intentional or incidental learning paradigms. In both, attributes that had been categorized at presentation did not differ in effectiveness as subsequent recall cues from those that had not. In a third experiment, with incidental learning, categorized cues were less effective than uncategorized cues. Thus, observed effects of categorization appear to be sensitive to minor differences in experimental procedure between studies. © 1980 Psychonomic Society, Inc

Recall cued by selectively attended and unattended attributes