English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this article an author determines the composition of the general tort, which in modern domestic legal doctrine consists of harm, wrongful conduct of the perpetrator, the causal link between the actions of the perpetrator and the consequences of harm, and the fault of the perpetrator on the examples of scientific works and law enforcement practice,.It is pointed out that the court must establish all the elements of a general tort as a necessary condition for the occurrence of civil liability for damage caused by actions or omissions.Given the principle of adversarial proceedings, it is justified to clearly distinguish between the parties to the tort dispute the obligation to prove the presence or absence of a particular element of the general tort.There have been cases of incorrect borrowing from the decisions of the Supreme Court by the courts of lower instances of the citation on the distribution of such a duty and its use as mandatory to consider the conclusion when choosing and applying the rule of law to the disputed relationship.Meanwhile, the use of a separate phrase taken out of the context of a court decision in a particular case with the relevant parties, as mandatory to consider the conclusion, leads to the substitution of causation and affects the distribution of responsibilities for proving elements of a general tort between the parties.In this connection, the defendant is unreasonably obliged to prove not only his absence of guilt, but also his non-involvement in the damage.Although, according to scientific research, as well as a long-standing law enforcement tradition of proving the existence of damage, its size, illegal behavior of the perpetrator, the causal link between the damage and the wrongful acts of the perpetrator is the responsibility of the person who appropriately claims and asks to protect his/her violated right.Keywords: general tort, damage, reparation, obligation to prove, composition of the tort, causation, guilt.

The value of the general tort in the process of proving the dispute