English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article examines legal, organizational aspects of documenting administrative offenses for violating the rules of quarantine of people. The decisions of the courts of  Ukraine are studied, in which the evidence is examined from different angles, the question of their belonging, admissibility and sufficiency is studied. Based on the analysis of law enforcement practice of judicial bodies, the generalization of fundamental legal positions of courts aimed at observance of the principles of the rule of law and observance of human rights and freedoms has been carried out. Conclusions are made about the peculiarities of the use of sources of evidence when documenting violations of human quarantine rules. It is proposed to supplement the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses with a number of articles that would contain procedural norms aimed at regulating the procedure and rules for collecting evidence on violations of human quarantine rules.Approval of the legality of the actions of authorized officials who have been authorized by the state to draw up reports on administrative offenses and to bring persons to administrative responsibility under Art. 443 CUAO it is necessary to supplement CUAO with articles of Art. 2511 CUAO “Belonging of evidences”, Art. 2512 of the Code of Administrative Offenses “Admissibility of evidence”, Art. 2513 CUAO “Reliability of evidences”, Art. 2514 of the Code of Administrative Offenses “Sufficiency of evidence”, Art. 2515 CUAO “Obligation of evidence”. Art. 2516 CUAO “Collection of evidence”. These additions to the Code of Administrative Offenses will allow to a theory of evidence in cases of administrative offenses.Keywords: documentation, administrative offense, violation of human quarantine rules, affiliation, admissibility, sufficiency, reliability of evidence, collection of evidence.

Features of documenting an administrative offense in the field of violation of human quarantine rules