English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article considers problematic issues related to ensuring access to court decisions, including full access to the Unified State Register of Court Decisions, in the context of implementation of the constitutional principle of publicity of proceedings and inadmissibility of disclosure of pre-trial investigation information, especially in court decisions. There are proposals to revise and supplement the High Council of Justice with the provisions of the Procedure for maintaining the Unified State Register of Court Decisions, as well as the legal framework for access to court decisions, in particular Articles 2 and 4 of the Law of Ukraine «On Access to Court Decisions».Summing up, an author notes that finding a reasonable balance between ensuring access to court decisions in the context of implementing the constitutional principle of publicity of proceedings and the inadmissibility of disclosure of pre-trial investigation, especially in court decisions, is a practical requirement today. The answer to this in the short term may be a revision and amendment by the High Council of Justice of the Unified State Register of Judgments, and in the medium term - a revision of the legal framework for access to judgments, including Articles 2 and 4 of the Law of Ukraine «On Access to Judgments». Such measures, in our opinion, will only strengthen the practical implementation of the constitutional principles of transparency of the judiciary.Key words: transparency of the judiciary, transparency of court proceedings, access to court decisions, inadmissibility of disclosure of information of pre-trial investigation.

In search of a balance between ensuring access to court decisions and the inadmissibility of disclosure of pre-trial investigation information