English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolEn el presente estudio se constata que la doctrina jurisprudencial que se da en torno al articulo 24.1 de la Constitucion Espanola —el precepto mas invocado estadisticamente de cuantos la integran— ha incrementado de manera notable su ambito de actuacion, de manera que influye en numerosas parcelas del derecho civil. Entre otros extremos ha amplificado su ambito subjetivo al prescindir del criterio de la nacionalidad e, incluso, de la residencia legal en el territorio nacional, lo cual provoco la modificacion de la Ley Organica 4/2000 reguladora de los derechos y libertades de los extranjeros en Espana. Asimismo, permitio la intervencion en los procedimientos de adopcion de quienes, inicial y transitoriamente, tan solo eran acogedores de los menores de edad, y contribuyo a la reforma de los articulos 133 y 136 del Codigo Civil en materia de filiacion. De igual forma, tras un examen del precepto, sus antecedentes y, en particular, sus principales manifestaciones —conforme a la interpretacion llevada a cabo por nuestros mas altos tribunales— se advierte su influjo en una institucion tan longeva como es la compensacion de creditos, de modo que contribuye a solucionar una cuestion sobre la que recaian numerosas decisiones contradictorias. EnglishIn this paper it is verified that the jurisprudential doctrine relapsed around the Art. 24.1 of the Spanish Constitution —the most statistically invoked precept of this rule— has significantly increased its scope of action influencing numerous plots of Civil Law. The analyzed norm has amplified its subjective scope by dispensing with the criterion of nationality and even the one of legal residence in the national territory, causing the reform of the Organic Law 4/2000 regulating the rights and freedoms of foreigners in Spain, among other provisions; thus, it has allowed intervention in the adoption procedures of those who, initially and temporarily, were only hospitable to minors, contributing also to the reform of Arts. 133 and 136 of the Civil Code in matters of filiation. After analyzing the precept, its antecedents and, in particular, its main projections according to the interpretation carried out by our highest courts, it is even noticed its influence in an institution as antique as the compensation of credits contributing to solve a question on which many contradictory decisions were coming.

Proyecciones de la tutela judicial y su repercusión en materia de nacionalidad, adopción, filiación y compensación