English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The necessity of determining a coordinated system of institutional support for the protection of the rights, freedoms and legally protected interests of the participants of personal non-property and property relations is substantiated. The substantiation of the national model of organization of execution of decisions of courts and other bodies as an integral part of the institutional mechanism of protection of property interests of private law was further developed.The classification of various systems of organization of execution of court decisions on various criteria is given: on a way of the organization of a profession of the executor, on a place of bodies and officials of execution, depending on whether bodies of execution are uniform structure, or there are some independent organizations, depending on bodies are empowered to enforce decisions.Based on the analysis of the existing model of organization of execution of court decisions, the need for clear definition of the status of enforcement bodies, separation of their participation from other authorized bodies (persons) that ensure the implementation of court decisions and other bodies, as well as increasing the status of state executor the subject of execution, and not the body of the state executive service. There are arguments that the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, as a regulator, cannot act as a subject of execution at the same time, as in this way an obvious conflict of interests can be traced.It is concluded that the process of creating an effective and efficient institutional structure for the implementation of decisions of courts and other bodies is not completed, the modern mixed model of enforcement should be considered transitional with the need to develop a capable organizational structure of enforcement bodies.Keywords: enforcement of judicial decisions, organization of enforcement of a decision, enforcement proceedings, state enforcement service, state executor.

Institutional Provision of Protection of Property Interests of Private Law Subjects during Enforcement of Court Decisions