English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This literary review seeks methodologies to measure the performance and complexity of projects, and to demonstrate the non-existence of a comparison between both measurements under the standard definition of performance. The difference between qualitative and holistic methodologies and those based on applied graph theory is established, and current variations and trends in project performance and success measurements are explored, leading us to reevaluate the investigated concepts’ definitions and appreciate the advantages that result from using methods based on applied graph theory. It is concluded that work schedules can, done properly, be used as a basis for measuring project complexity.

Revisión literaria e histórica de medidas de complejidad de proyectos y desempeño de proyectos