English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper presents a mathematical modeling for a series of experiments in which humic acid (AH) and calcium chloride (CaCl2) were used, in order to visualize the amount of contaminant before and after the nanofiltration (NF) process, using Excitation Emission Matrix Spectroscopy (EEMS). It allows to a better understanding of membrane fouling. The membrane used for these experiments was a NF ceramic membrane made of titanium dioxide (TiO2). For the experimental determinations, a constant amount of 10 mg/L HA and different amounts of CaCl2, respectively 1, 2, 3 and 4 mmol/L were used, considering the working methodology presented in this article. The presence of the amount of contaminant in water was determined using the EEMS method using the FP-8300 Spectrophotometer, after which a spectral analysis was performed. TableCurve 3D software was used to make the mathematical models in order to ensure that the equations obtained had the same shape. The values of the correlation coefficients, corresponding to the generated equations, have values ranging from 0.91 to 0.93. In order to verify the mathematical models thus obtained, graphs of the difference between the surface obtained with the help of the mathematical models and the surface obtained by means of real data were drawn. In conclusion, it turns out that, the largest difference was obtained in the case of samples taken from the feed, with a maximum difference of 31 fluorescence intensity arbitrary units (a.u.), and for the samples taken from the permeate the deference is 14 fluorescence intensity a.u.

Ceramic Nanofiltration Membrane Fouling: Application of Mathematical Modelling to the Use of Excitation Emission Matrix Spectroscopy