English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper outlines a descriptive and interpretative qualitative research project that is framed within a larger study, the general aim of which is to diagnose university policies and practices in order to propose an Institutionalization Plan to Address Diversity in Higher Education. We have investigated the vision of university leaders as a key part of this process. To this end, 26 institutional leaders from the University of Córdoba (Spain) have been interviewed, selected intentionally in accordance with the following criteria: leadership level (Vice-Chancellor, Department Director, Dean, Director of Specific Services, President of the Student Council, Representatives of Administration and Services Staff), representation of the entire university community (Teaching and Research Staff, Students, and Administration and Services Staff), encompassing all areas of knowledge, and gender balance. Discourse analysis was used to code all the information produced deductive and inductive -, followed by recoding and categorization, with code validation by means of intercoder agreement and expert judgment. The findings highlight existing "good practices" but also recognize difficulties. Proposals for institutionalization pertain to the following areas: management (policies and strategies, infrastructure, recognition, external entities and resources); education (awareness and sensitization, training and specific measures for students from protected groups); innovation, research and transfer, dissemination, evaluations and culture. The discourse of these leaders highlights training, awareness and dissemination as fundamental lines of action. In addition, we found certain intergroup differences between the different levels of leadership. The conclusions coincide with previous studies with regard to some of the proposals. However, in this case, a greater volume of more specific categories and subcategories is obtained. Consequently, this study contributes greater applicability and functionality to the context studied with a greater possibility for transference. Furthermore, unlike the international studies developed that focus on the body responsible for addressing or dealing with diversity, this paper takes into account all levels of organizational leadership and sectors of the community. This is important if we intend to address or manage diversity as an integral part of university life.

INSTITUTIONALIZATION PROPOSALS OF ATTENTION TO DIVERSITY AT UNIVERSITY FROM THE VISION OF LEADERS