English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Online headspace-SIFT/MS was evaluated by comparing performance with headspace-GC/MS for 20 types of VOCs. Performance evaluation was determined by comparing the linearity of the calibration curve, the detection limits, and the quantitation limits. The accuracy and precision of the two analytical methods were also compared. Online HSS-SIFT/MS possessed quantification almost equal to HSS-GC/MS. In the case of analysis accuracy and precision, inaccuracies were observed at low concentrations. However, overall, online HSS-SIFT/MS presented sufficient accuracy to determine the concentrations for that defines chemical accidents.

Compatibility Evaluation of Online Headspace with Direct Mass Spectrometry for Real-time Water Quality Monitoring in Chemical Accidents