English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Do sending and receiving states have an obligation to address the fundamental causes of unauthorized migration? Inherent in the concept of forced migration is an obliga- tion on sending and receiving states to assist people displaced by factors beyond their control. An expanded definition of forced migration would allow the inclusion of economic migrants, supplying the moral and legal justification for international cooperation on the reduction of the need to migrate. An assessment of the causes of economic migration as human rights violations could serve as the basis for the new definition. Mexico-U.S. mi- gration, one of the largest binational streams of migration in the world, serves as the case study.

Una redefinición de la migración forzosa con base en los derechos humanos