English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

One question persists; is there anything like positive plagiarism? In other words, is using ready-made digital CAD components considered plagiarism? Can downloading and using ready-made components be beneficial? In fact, it might, at least for professionals who are not expected to waste time building models or drafting typical details that are so mundane (Fane 2015). It is not considered as applicable to students of architecture who are supposed to draft or model the most mundane elements of their work themselves. However, students do have access to the same resources professional have with no difference nor guidance which raises many concerns regarding integrity and educational benefits. Even though a professional would use ready-made components to complete a design assignment, students are always encouraged to produce their developed libraries. The Internet and the World Wide Web have opened new avenues for research misconduct. They have also opened new avenues to discovery (Evans. 2016). Even the way course design is fashioned is changing daily to include innovative ways to promote learning and scholarly discussion using the Internet. Some argue that this will promote misconduct. Others believe that it will combat it (Evans 2000).

The Online Moral Paradox: Understanding the Benefits of Downloadable Content on the Performance of Students in the Design Studio